Introduction to Indian Art by Ananda K Coomaraswamy
Those of you who do not know Coomaraswamy, this is what a noted artist said about him ‘ Today, If India takes her due rank as a first class artistic power, it is in large measure owing to Coomaraswamy’. He was one of the first Asian student of Indian Art and one of the finest interpreters of the same. Besides studying art, as ASI was discovering it in various parts of the country, he was able to derive the essence of Indian art. He was able to connect with the mind of the artist and the patron, with the collective psyche of the people of that era.
On a time horizon the book moves from Indo-Sumerian times till the late medieval period, but that is what most history books do. What Coomarasway tells you is not a laundry list of items found from a certain place and tries and interprets them wrt to their radio carbon dating. Instead he studies the various connected elements, he studies the art across the regions at a given point in time and derives the essence of it for the reader. He tells you the difference between the interpretation of art in the eastern mind in the past and the modern mind that is primarily dominated by the logical west. He tells you how art is or rather was such an integral part of Indian life and there was no art for the sake of art, as it exists in the west. He talks about the symbolism in our art and the absence of realism. You will see that when you see the Buddha figures with local features in each region while all the symbols of a Mahapurush remain the same all across. He says every icon is at once a symbol and a representation.
He says Indian art was never meant to be decorative, and any decorative element that exists may have come from the west. He does not even miss talking about the art of the ages that is not available to us and was probably made in perishable material like wood or clay and hence not survived. He places the genesis of stone art in wood based on the earliest designs that it imitates from wood carving continuity in art. He traces the cult of sun and fire, Yaksha and Nagas to the remote past, beyond what we know through excavations.
He says that apparent predominance of Buddhist art is mainly due to special circumstances of patronage leading to abundant production in certain centers and does not really mean any submergence of Brahminical tradition. He concludes that early Buddhist art is the art by the people while the medieval art is by the monks only. He relates Great Enlightenment of Buddha to the awakening of the race from innocence to consciousness implied in the passage from Vedic to Vedantic thought. For Gupta period, considered to be the golden age of Indian art, he says ‘ The sum of Indian culture is so rich, so fully organized and so conscious that we can hardly fail to regard the preceding half a millennium as the period of high creative activity in the whole development of Hindu Civilization – an activity to be regarded as the formal and material embodiment of Great Enlightenment’. It is during this time that India was for the first time spiritually and intellectually one. All foreign influences have been absorbed and Indianized. Forms and experiences of finite life are revelations of the infinite. Philosophy and faith possess a common language in the art that is at once abstract and sensuous, reserved and passionate. This was the age when renunciation and enjoyment are perfectly attuned. All India was richly painted and art was the art of the race and not any individual.
Choosing his favorite time in history he says’ Were it possible to put back the hands of the clock and revisit ancient India, it is perhaps to the eighth century that we should turn, choosing for our pilgrimage a moment when temple building and sculpture were in the fullest tide of their activity, but little of the work of former centuries had been destroyed.’
About the artist and his art he says – When the intellect is self-poised, then the forms of art are conceived. The artist is not a special kind of a man, but every man is a special kind of artist, or else is something less than a man. To understand both you have to place yourself in the position of the artist or the patron – to think their thoughts or to see with their eyes. Study art to enlarge your own consciousness of being.
A must read for anyone who wants to understand Indian art holistically.http://www.anureviews.com/introduction-to-indian-art-by-ananda-k-coomaraswamy/https://i1.wp.com/www.anureviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/ITIA-Coomaraswamy.jpg?fit=403%2C629https://i1.wp.com/www.anureviews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/ITIA-Coomaraswamy.jpg?resize=150%2C150Art HistoryBook ReviewsThose of you who do not know Coomaraswamy, this is what a noted artist said about him ‘ Today, If India takes her due rank as a first class artistic power, it is in large measure owing to Coomaraswamy’. He was one of the first Asian student of Indian...Anuradha GoyalAnuradha Goyal[email protected]AdministratorAnuradha Goyal is the author of 'The Mouse Charmers - Digital Pioneers of India' , a travel blogger and an Innovation consultant. AnuReviews - her book reviews blog finds a place in Limca Book of Records for being India's biggest book reviews blog. Know More ...Anu Reviews